“Construction should be decorated. Decoration should never be purposely constructed.”
It seems to me that Jones is expressing that the functionality of a design should never be outweighed by the ornamentation. I agree with Jones’ argument to the extent that it is valid when applied to mass production as this ensures that products can be made to fulfil their function. However there are instances where the consumer desires decorative construction, as per the example of the excessively ornate high heels shown in this image. It is obvious that the functionality in this product has been overridden by the aesthetic, which doesn’t conform to the ideals introduced by Jones in the mid 19th Century. The emphasis on functional and efficient design is ridiculed in Charles Dickens’ novel Hard Times, wherein the government official attempts to explain to the little girl that she “mustn’t fancy” in regards to her desires for floral patterns on her carpet(Raizman, 54-55). Excessively ornate, or functional? The debate continues.